2024 Cryptocurrency Tier List (From F to S)

·

The cryptocurrency landscape has evolved dramatically over the past few years. With new technologies emerging and older projects adapting—or failing to adapt—a fresh evaluation is long overdue. This tier list ranks the top 20 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, assessing them across key blockchain metrics: decentralization, scalability, security, and utility.

While data-driven, this ranking also reflects subjective judgment on each project’s progress toward solving the blockchain trilemma. Stablecoins are excluded, and meme coins are included based on cultural impact and adoption potential.

Let’s dive into the tiers—from the underperformers to the undisputed leaders.


F Tier – The Lowest Performers

Kaspa (KAS)

Kaspa aims to create a mobile, boundary-free settlement layer for crypto. On paper, that sounds ambitious—but in practice, it lacks substance. The promise of zero-fee transactions falls flat when users must first claim tokens from a faucet to cover nominal costs.

Beyond that, decentralization remains a work in progress. Worse, Kaspa has been accused of being an "influencer coin," distributing large amounts of tokens to social media personalities as part of marketing campaigns. This has led to reckless dumping, undermining organic growth and trust.

While technically innovative with its blockDAG structure, Kaspa’s reputation issues and limited real-world utility keep it firmly in the F tier—for now.

👉 Discover how leading blockchain platforms are redefining digital value

Pepe (PEPE)

PEPE exists purely as a meme. Its roadmap? “Meme → Vibe & HODL → Meme takeover.” There's no utility, no development team roadmap, and no technical whitepaper.

While memecoins can drive awareness, PEPE offers nothing beyond speculation. High volatility, no use case, and copycat design make it a poor entry point for newcomers exploring crypto.

It may have viral appeal, but as an investment or technological asset? Solid F.

Shiba Inu (SHIB)

Like PEPE, SHIB began as a joke—but unlike PEPE, it has built some infrastructure. The launch of ShibaSwap, a decentralized exchange forked from Uniswap, adds minimal but tangible utility.

Developers have also introduced a layer-1 blockchain called Shibarium, aiming to reduce fees and increase scalability. However, these efforts feel more like damage control than innovation.

Still heavily reliant on hype and speculation, SHIB earns a slightly higher score within the F tier due to incremental progress—but it’s far from meaningful adoption.

LEO (LEO)

LEO is the utility token of Bitfinex, offering fee discounts and access to certain trading tools. It has no standalone blockchain and operates entirely within a centralized ecosystem.

There’s no decentralization, limited security value, and narrow utility outside one exchange. While it serves its niche well, it doesn’t belong in a discussion about foundational crypto assets.

LEO ranks high in the F tier simply because it functions as intended—just not as a revolutionary technology.


D Tier – Flawed But Functional

Tron (TRX)

Tron launched in 2017 with a mission to decentralize the internet via dApps and blockchain storage. It acquired BitTorrent in 2018, integrating blockchain into peer-to-peer file sharing.

TRX supports USDT transfers at scale and boasts low fees and fast speeds—though actual throughput (~80 TPS) falls far short of claimed 2,000 TPS.

Controversy surrounds founder Justin Sun and allegations of whitepaper plagiarism. Regulatory scrutiny from the SEC and CFTC further clouds its future.

Still active and widely used for stablecoin transfers, Tron earns a low D-tier placement.

Bitcoin Cash (BCH)

A hard fork of BTC, Bitcoin Cash prioritizes scalability through larger block sizes. It achieves around 79 TPS—better than Bitcoin’s ~7 TPS—but still lags behind modern chains.

BCH competes on low fees and faster confirmations, but lacks smart contract functionality and developer momentum. Once seen as a payment-focused alternative, it’s now overshadowed by more versatile Layer-1 networks.

BCH’s early mover advantage keeps it relevant—but barely. Low D tier reflects stagnation despite solid fundamentals.

Binance Smart Chain (BNB)

Now known as BNB Chain, this is Binance’s proprietary blockchain. It supports up to 2000 TPS (theoretically), with plans to scale further and slash fees.

However, BNB is highly centralized—controlled largely by Binance itself. User support exists, which is rare in crypto—but that convenience comes at the cost of true decentralization.

Despite massive adoption due to low costs and exchange integration, its centralization risks place it at the top of the D tier.


C Tier – Projects With Potential

ICP (Internet Computer)

Launched with grand ambitions to rival AWS using decentralized cloud computing, ICP’s price crashed from $2000 to ~$6. Token mismanagement led to inflationary supply issues.

Yet, technically, ICP delivers: efficient smart contracts, chain-native AI models, and full-stack dApps running directly on the blockchain.

It’s ahead of most chains in architectural innovation—but burdened by poor first impressions. If it regains trust, ICP could rise significantly. For now, low C tier.

Dogecoin (DOGE)

Born as a parody, Dogecoin outlived countless jokes. A Litecoin fork with Scrypt mining and fast blocks, DOGE benefits from strong community support and brand recognition.

Used occasionally for tipping or payments (e.g., by Tesla years ago), its utility remains minimal. But as the original memecoin that brought millions into crypto, it earns honorary C-tier status.


B Tier – Solid Performers

Litecoin (LTC)

The "silver to Bitcoin’s gold," LTC offers faster block times (2.5 min) and uses Scrypt for ASIC resistance. At ~56 TPS, it's outpaced by newer chains.

No smart contracts or DeFi ecosystem limit its evolution. Still, its longevity and reliability earn it a lower B-tier spot—upgraded from previous assessments.

Ripple (XRP)

XRP targets financial institutions with fast cross-border settlements. Ripple works behind the scenes with banks globally to build interoperable payment rails.

Regulatory battles have slowed adoption, but its focus on compliance gives it legitimacy rare among cryptos. B-tier reflects strong real-world utility despite centralization concerns.

Near Protocol (NEAR)

NEAR focuses on usability with human-readable accounts and developer-friendly tools. Using sharding under the hood, it promises up to 100,000 TPS—though current throughput is modest (~100 TPS).

Its commitment to simplifying Web3 earns high marks. High B tier for innovation and long-term potential.

Base (BASE)

Coinbase’s Ethereum Layer-2 solution leverages optimistic rollups and account abstraction to improve UX. Fully EVM-compatible and committed to decentralization.

Still early in development and reliant on Coinbase infrastructure, Base shows promise. Placed in high B tier due to strategic positioning and growing ecosystem.

Avalanche (AVAX)

Avalanche offers a unique three-chain architecture for scalability and speed. Home to major DeFi protocols like Trader Joe and Pangolin.

Recent exploits totaling $100M in losses raise security concerns. Otherwise technically strong—solid B-tier placement until trust is restored.


A Tier – Excellent Projects

Uniswap (UNI)

The pioneer of automated market makers (AMMs), Uniswap powers much of DeFi. Most DEXs either fork or draw inspiration from its codebase.

High adoption, transparency, and governance make UNI a cornerstone of decentralized finance. Solid A-tier rating.

Cardano (ADA)

Academic-driven development sets Cardano apart. Though slow to deliver smart contracts, it emphasizes peer-reviewed research and long-term sustainability.

Vision includes RealFi—DeFi integrated with real-world assets. Balanced across security and functionality. Mid-A tier for consistency despite delays.

Solana (SOL)

Blazing-fast speeds (up to 65k TPS), low fees, vibrant NFT and DeFi ecosystems—Solana delivers performance.

But network outages remain a concern. Despite resilience and innovation like Token Extensions, occasional downtime prevents an S-tier label. Strong A-tier contender.

Polygon (MATIC)

One of the first effective Ethereum Layer-2 solutions using sidechains and zk-rollups. Successfully reduced congestion and gas fees for thousands of dApps.

Facing increased competition from other L2s, Polygon must keep innovating. Still earns a solid A-tier for proven results.

Polkadot (DOT)

Polkadot enables interoperability between blockchains via parachains. Technically advanced with strong fundamentals.

Marketing missteps aside, DOT stands out as one of the few altcoins with genuine blue-chip potential. High A-tier recognition.


S Tier – The Blue Chips

Bitcoin (BTC)

The original cryptocurrency. Not the fastest or cheapest—but the most secure store of value ever created.

Decentralized, battle-tested, scarce. BTC anchors the entire ecosystem. S-tier by legacy and resilience—even if secondary layers like Lightning are needed for usability.

👉 See how next-gen blockchains are building on Bitcoin’s foundation

Ethereum (ETH)

The undisputed leader. First-mover in smart contracts, home to DeFi, NFTs, DAOs, and most Web3 innovation.

Backed by continuous upgrades (e.g., EIP-4844), Layer-2 scaling, and a world-class dev community. Universally respected and essential to crypto’s future.

ETH takes the top spot—not just for what it is today, but for enabling everything else.


Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why are memecoins included in this ranking?
A: Because they influence adoption and market sentiment—even without utility. Their cultural impact matters in a speculative ecosystem.

Q: Is decentralization more important than scalability?
A: It depends on use case. For value storage (like BTC), decentralization is paramount. For apps needing speed (like Solana), scalability takes priority—but balance is ideal.

Q: Can a centralized chain like BNB still succeed?
A: Yes—short term. Centralized chains often offer better UX and performance initially but face trust and censorship risks long term.

Q: Why isn’t Cosmos ranked higher?
A: While technically strong with IBC interoperability, Cosmos lacks unified branding and mass adoption compared to Polkadot or Ethereum.

Q: What determines a project’s long-term survival?
A: Sustainable development funding, active community governance, continuous innovation, and real-world utility beyond speculation.

Q: Will any C-tier projects rise to A-tier?
A: Possibly. ICP could climb if it regains trust; Doge would need actual utility upgrades—unlikely given its meme-first identity.

👉 Explore how top-tier cryptos maintain dominance through innovation