In a bold move signaling potential regulatory reform, New York Assemblymember Ron Kim has introduced Bill A9899, a legislative proposal designed to overhaul the state’s controversial cryptocurrency licensing system. Long criticized for its restrictive and costly requirements, New York’s BitLicense framework has deterred many crypto startups from operating in the state. Kim’s new bill aims to replace it with a more balanced, innovation-friendly approach—sparking renewed interest in the future of digital assets, blockchain technology, and crypto regulation in one of the world’s most influential financial hubs.
The Problem with BitLicense
Since its introduction in 2015 by the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), the BitLicense has been a major point of contention within the cryptocurrency industry. Designed to regulate virtual currency businesses, the license has instead become synonymous with bureaucratic hurdles, high compliance costs, and regulatory overreach.
👉 Discover how new regulatory frameworks could reshape crypto innovation in major financial centers.
Only a handful of companies have successfully obtained a BitLicense over the past decade. In contrast, Kim’s proposed bill already has more legislative supporters than there are licensed crypto firms in the state—highlighting just how out of step the current system is with market realities.
“The current framework gives too much unchecked power to a single regulatory agency,” Kim stated in a recent interview. “Regulations were created unilaterally, without legislative input. That’s not how we should be treating a transformative industry like blockchain.”
A New Vision: Bill A9899
Kim’s Bill A9899 seeks to eliminate the BitLicense entirely and replace it with a modern, transparent, and startup-friendly regulatory model. While maintaining essential consumer protections, the legislation aims to reduce barriers to entry for emerging crypto businesses—especially those launching digital asset exchanges.
Key components of the proposed bill include:
- Elimination of high licensing fees that have historically burdened early-stage companies
- Streamlined compliance requirements focused on cybersecurity, recordkeeping, and operational transparency
- Mandatory use of third-party custodians to safeguard user funds and prevent fraud, accounting errors, and cyberattacks
- Requirements for independent audits and insurance mechanisms similar to those used by traditional financial institutions
Rather than treating crypto firms as high-risk outliers, the bill positions them as legitimate financial innovators deserving of a fair regulatory playing field.
“This isn’t about removing oversight—it’s about making it smarter,” Kim emphasized. “We want to encourage responsible innovation while ensuring user protection and financial integrity.”
Focus on Exchanges and Consumer Protection
While the bill promotes deregulation in spirit, it doesn’t abandon oversight. Instead, it shifts focus toward exchange operations, where risks like market manipulation, money laundering, and security breaches are most acute.
Under the new framework, exchanges would be required to:
- Implement robust cybersecurity protocols
- Maintain detailed transaction logs accessible for audit
- Partner with insured custodial institutions
- Submit to regular third-party reviews
“The goal is a monitoring system that ensures accountability—not one that holds actual funds,” Kim explained. “It’s about transparency and trust, not control.”
This balanced approach reflects growing recognition that effective regulation should foster innovation rather than stifle it. By aligning crypto rules with those governing conventional finance, the bill aims to integrate digital assets into the mainstream economy—without compromising safety.
Industry Collaboration and Expert Input
Kim is not drafting this legislation in isolation. He’s actively collaborating with key figures in the blockchain and fintech space, including Bernard Moon, co-founder of venture fund SparkLabs, and Richie Hecker, Chief Economist at the Crypto Working Group.
Their insights are helping shape a regulatory model grounded in real-world business challenges and technological feasibility. Kim remains open to feedback from developers, entrepreneurs, and legal experts as the bill progresses through committee stages.
“We’re building this with the industry, not against it,” he said. “The goal is a framework that works for innovators, consumers, and regulators alike.”
Economic Opportunity for New York
Beyond fairness and innovation, Kim sees clear economic incentives. As the self-proclaimed “financial capital of the world,” New York stands to gain significantly by embracing crypto rather than resisting it.
A more welcoming regulatory climate could attract thousands of jobs, billions in investment, and new tax revenue from a rapidly growing sector. Startups currently based elsewhere—or不敢 enter the state at all—might reconsider if compliance becomes feasible.
👉 See how supportive regulations can unlock economic growth through blockchain innovation.
“If we make it easier for exchanges and fintech firms to operate here,” Kim noted, “we open the door to new income streams for the state. This is about leadership. With so much global interest in cryptocurrency, New York has a chance to lead—not lag.”
FAQs: Understanding the Future of Crypto Regulation in New York
Q: What is the BitLicense?
A: The BitLicense is a regulatory permit required by businesses dealing in virtual currencies in New York State. Introduced in 2015 by the NYDFS, it has been criticized for its complexity, high cost, and lack of legislative oversight.
Q: How does Bill A9899 differ from the BitLicense?
A: Unlike the current system, Bill A9899 would eliminate mandatory licensing fees, reduce bureaucratic barriers, and introduce standardized compliance rules developed with legislative input—making it easier for startups to launch and operate legally.
Q: Will consumer protections be weakened under the new bill?
A: No. The bill maintains strong safeguards, including third-party custody requirements, mandatory audits, cybersecurity standards, and anti-fraud measures—ensuring user funds and data remain protected.
Q: Has the bill been passed into law yet?
A: Not yet. Bill A9899 was introduced in February and is currently under review. While support is growing, it must pass both legislative chambers and be signed by the governor before becoming law.
Q: Why does New York’s crypto policy matter nationally?
A: Due to its status as a global financial center, regulatory decisions in New York often influence policies in other states and countries. A shift toward innovation-friendly rules could set a precedent for broader U.S. crypto regulation.
Q: Could this bill help bring more blockchain jobs to New York?
A: Yes. By lowering entry barriers for startups and exchanges, the bill could stimulate job creation in tech, finance, cybersecurity, and legal compliance—revitalizing New York’s position at the forefront of financial innovation.
Looking Ahead
While the path from proposal to law is long and uncertain, Kim’s initiative marks a pivotal moment in New York’s relationship with digital finance. After years of being seen as hostile to crypto innovation, the state may finally be ready to embrace change.
With core keywords like crypto regulation, blockchain innovation, digital asset exchanges, and financial technology policy shaping the national conversation, this bill represents more than just local reform—it’s a potential blueprint for how governments can support technological progress without sacrificing security or accountability.
👉 Explore how forward-thinking policies are driving the next wave of blockchain adoption worldwide.
If successful, New York could once again lead by example—proving that smart regulation and disruptive innovation can go hand in hand.