The cryptocurrency market witnessed a surprising rally in June, with several Bitcoin forks—Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Bitcoin SV (BSV), and eCash (XEC)—posting significant gains. Alongside them, lesser-known altcoins like Kaspa (KAS) and FLEX Coin (FLEX) also climbed sharply, briefly stealing the spotlight from larger digital assets. However, while price charts tell a bullish story, on-chain data and fundamental metrics raise serious questions about whether these rallies are built on real adoption or merely speculative manipulation.
Market Sentiment Shifts Amid Regulatory and Institutional Moves
June began on a sour note for crypto markets. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed new lawsuits against two of the world’s largest exchanges—Binance and Coinbase—triggering a wave of negative sentiment across digital assets. Bitcoin dropped below $30,000, and many altcoins followed suit.
👉 Discover how institutional moves are reshaping the crypto landscape today.
But sentiment flipped dramatically on June 16, when BlackRock—the world’s largest asset manager—filed for a spot Bitcoin ETF. This pivotal move reignited institutional interest in digital assets, sparking a broader market recovery. Bitcoin rebounded past $30,100, gaining 11.94% for the month—the first time since April 2023 it had crossed the psychologically significant $30,000 threshold.
While BTC led the charge, the real outliers were a group of smaller-cap cryptocurrencies, particularly those stemming from Bitcoin’s legacy forks.
FLEX Coin Rises on OPNX Integration Hype
FLEX Coin (FLEX) emerged as one of June’s top performers, climbing to a 13-month high of $4.37 on June 27. The surge followed its integration with Open Exchange (OPNX), a platform designed to help creditors of bankrupt entities like Three Arrows Capital (3AC) settle claims.
OPNX is backed by the co-founders of 3AC, who remain under legal scrutiny for their role in the fund’s collapse. Despite facing potential liabilities exceeding $1 billion, they continue to support OPNX under a new venture using the same branding.
FLEX gained utility within OPNX by enabling users to resolve claims and earn staking rewards. In March 2024, Seychelles courts approved FLEX’s exchange restructuring plan, lending it a veneer of legitimacy.
Yet red flags abound. While FLEX’s price neared its 2022 all-time high, daily trading volume remained extremely low—just 0.01% of its peak $1 billion daily volume. This disconnect suggests limited organic demand and high susceptibility to price manipulation.
With low liquidity, even small trades can trigger outsized price swings. Technically, FLEX faces strong resistance at $5.08 (2022 breakout level) and $7.56 (all-time high). A reversal could see it drop 80% to $0.75—the accumulation zone from May 2023.
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Doubles on EDX Listing Boost
Bitcoin Cash saw its price more than double in June following its listing on EDX Markets—a new institutional-grade exchange backed by major financial firms including Fidelity and Charles Schwab.
BCH debuted alongside BTC, ETH, and LTC as one of EDX’s four inaugural assets. While the listing acted as a positive catalyst, other factors fueled the rally:
- Negative perpetual swap funding rates, indicating strong short positions being squeezed.
- Suspicious activity on Korean exchange Upbit, where price divergence suggests potential market manipulation.
According to The TIE, a crypto analytics firm, over $21 million in BCH perpetual positions were liquidated in June—far above normal levels, which typically see only tens of thousands in daily liquidations.
Despite the price surge, fundamentals remain weak. Total fees paid on the Bitcoin Cash blockchain have averaged under $200 per day since January 2024—a sign of minimal network usage.
👉 Explore how blockchain activity reflects true network health beyond price trends.
For context, Litecoin (LTC), which offers similar transactional utility, generates about ten times more fee revenue for miners. This stark contrast casts doubt on the sustainability of BCH’s rally, especially with high liquidation levels pointing to speculative overreach.
BSV Rides BCH’s Coattails Despite Weak Fundamentals
Bitcoin SV (BSV) rose 31.4% in June, closely tracking BCH with a correlation coefficient of 0.78. The rally followed BSV’s drop to a multi-year low of $21.43 on June 10.
Since 2022, BSV has been in a prolonged downtrend as investor interest waned post-bull market. Declining transaction volume and miner activity have weakened network security.
A major concern is BSV’s vulnerability to 51% attacks. Due to low hash rate competition, launching a one-hour attack on BSV costs less than $2,000—compared to over $1.4 million for Bitcoin. This makes the network highly susceptible to malicious takeovers.
With poor utility, minimal adoption, and serious security flaws, BSV’s price movement appears driven more by sentiment spillover from BCH than any intrinsic value.
Kaspa (KAS) Gains on Innovation Hype and Low Liquidity
Kaspa (KAS) stands out as a technically innovative project. As a proof-of-work (PoW) blockchain like Bitcoin and Litecoin, Kaspa achieves block times of just one second—compared to Bitcoin’s 10 minutes—thanks to its blockDAG architecture.
Kaspa Labs, the team behind the network, announced plans for a public testnet that could scale throughput by up to 10,000x. This news boosted market sentiment and pushed KAS prices higher.
However, most KAS trading occurs on unregulated exchanges with low volume and poor trust scores (per CoinGecko). This lack of liquidity makes the token prone to volatility and manipulation.
Technically, KAS could retest its 2023 high near $0.40 if bullish momentum holds. But a pullback to its annual low near $0.15 remains a real risk.
Despite these concerns, KAS has shown a healthy uptrend over the past year—making higher highs and higher lows—suggesting some level of sustained interest amid fierce competition from larger PoW networks.
eCash (XEC) Joins the Fork Rally With Questionable Utility
eCash (XEC), a rebranded version of Bitcoin Cash ABC (itself a fork of BCH), joined the rally alongside BSV and BCH. Like its predecessors, XEC benefits from narrative momentum rather than strong fundamentals.
XEC is listed on major platforms like Binance and Bithumb but lacks support from U.S.-based exchanges—a concerning omission that limits regulatory legitimacy and institutional access.
The token exhibits classic signs of low liquidity and speculative trading. Its price movements often diverge from broader market trends, suggesting concentrated control or manipulation.
With minimal real-world use cases and security concerns similar to BSV, XEC’s long-term value proposition remains questionable.
Key Takeaways: Speculation vs. Sustainability
While BCH, BSV, XEC, KAS, and FLEX posted impressive gains in June, their rallies share common warning signs:
- Low network activity despite price increases.
- Minimal transaction fees, indicating poor utility.
- High price volatility due to thin order books.
- Heavy reliance on external catalysts rather than organic growth.
These patterns suggest that short-term pumps may be fueled by speculation, market manipulation, or narrative-driven FOMO—not sustainable adoption.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Why did Bitcoin forks like BCH and BSV surge in June?
A: The rally was driven by BlackRock’s ETF filing boosting overall market sentiment, combined with exchange listings (like EDX for BCH) and speculative trading due to low liquidity.
Q: Is FLEX Coin a good long-term investment?
A: Unlikely. Despite integration with OPNX, FLEX suffers from extremely low trading volume relative to price gains, raising concerns about manipulation and lack of organic demand.
Q: Can low-liquidity coins like KAS sustain their gains?
A: Possibly, if innovation delivers real adoption. But currently, KAS remains vulnerable to volatility and pump-and-dump schemes due to limited trading depth.
Q: Why is BSV considered insecure?
A: BSV’s low hash rate makes it cheap to execute a 51% attack—under $2,000 for one hour—making it far less secure than Bitcoin or even Litecoin.
Q: Does listing on EDX Markets guarantee success for BCH?
A: No. While EDX provides credibility, long-term performance depends on usage and fundamentals—areas where BCH continues to lag behind peers like Litecoin.
Q: Are all Bitcoin forks doomed to fail?
A: Not necessarily. Forks can succeed if they offer clear technical improvements or unique use cases. However, most—including BSV and XEC—have failed to differentiate meaningfully from BTC or BCH.
👉 Stay ahead of market trends with real-time data and secure trading tools.
Final Thoughts
The June rally in Bitcoin forks and niche altcoins highlights how quickly prices can move in low-liquidity markets—even without strong fundamentals. While events like ETF filings and exchange listings can spark momentum, lasting value comes from adoption, security, and utility.
Investors should approach these assets with caution: impressive price charts can mask deeper structural weaknesses. True innovation—not speculation—will determine which projects survive the next market cycle.
Core Keywords: Bitcoin forks, BCH, BSV, XEC, KAS, FLEX Coin, crypto market rally, sustainable gains