The long-anticipated transition of Ethereum from proof-of-work (PoW) to proof-of-stake (PoS)—commonly known as "the Merge"—is drawing near, sparking intense debate across the crypto ecosystem. With speculation mounting over a potential hard fork that could split Ethereum into two separate chains, key players including exchanges, DeFi protocols, and influential voices are beginning to publicly declare their positions.
This pivotal moment isn't just technical—it’s ideological, economic, and deeply strategic. As the community braces for what could be one of the most consequential events in blockchain history, let's explore how major stakeholders are aligning themselves and what this means for the future of Ethereum.
The Exchange Landscape: Diverging Strategies
Exchanges play a crucial role in shaping market perception during network splits. Their support—or lack thereof—for a forked chain can determine its liquidity, trading volume, and long-term viability.
Gate.io: Proactive Support for Both Chains
Gate.io has taken a forward-looking approach by announcing support for both potential outcomes of the Merge. From August 9 until the successful completion of the ETH2.0 upgrade, users can exchange their ETH 1:1 for either ETHS (representing the new PoS chain) or ETHW (representing a potential continuation of the PoW chain).
Importantly, Gate.io has built in safeguards: if the hard fork fails, ETHS will automatically convert back to standard ETH at a 1:1 ratio, and all ETHS/ETHW markets will be delisted. This balanced strategy allows users flexibility while minimizing risk exposure.
Poloniex: Backing Potential Forks with Futures
Poloniex has declared full support for Ethereum’s upgrade and any resulting forks. In a clear signal of confidence in market demand, the exchange stated that users holding ETH at the time of the fork will receive 1:1 airdrops of any new assets created.
Additionally, Poloniex plans to list futures contracts for forked tokens, indicating belief in trading interest around alternative chains—even if temporary.
Huobi: Cautious and Criteria-Driven
Huobi takes a more conservative stance. While respecting community consensus, the exchange explicitly discourages forks without meaningful innovation or technical improvement. It also opposes pre-mining activities.
To qualify for listing, a forked asset must meet five strict criteria:
- Advance notification to Huobi Global with official confirmation
- Implementation of two-way replay protection
- Guarantee that the new chain won’t be overwritten by the original
- Unique transaction formats requiring wallet upgrades
- Public release of tested client software before activation
These standards aim to ensure network stability and user security—setting a benchmark other platforms may follow.
OKX: Monitoring Demand Closely
OKX CEO Jay Hao affirmed the platform's support for the Merge. While neutral on potential forks, OKX will evaluate whether to list any hard fork token based on user demand and ecosystem adoption.
BitMEX: Betting on PoW with Futures
In a bold move, BitMEX launched an ETHPoW perpetual futures contract (ETHPOWZ22), settled in USDT (ERC-20) with up to 2x leverage. This financial instrument lets traders speculate on the value of a PoW-based Ethereum chain—even before it exists—demonstrating strong market anticipation.
Meanwhile, major players like Binance, Coinbase, and KuCoin have remained silent, likely waiting to assess community sentiment and technological clarity before committing.
Project Teams Speak Out: Unity Behind PoS
Most major DeFi and infrastructure projects have aligned firmly behind the PoS Ethereum chain, viewing it as the legitimate continuation of the network.
Chainlink: No Support for PoW Fork
Chainlink emphasized continuity: its oracle services will operate exclusively on post-Merge Ethereum. The team reaffirmed alignment with core Ethereum developers and rejected support for any PoW fork.
Argent & DeBank: Full Support for the Merge
Argent, the smart contract wallet provider, expressed excitement about the Merge and confirmed no plans to support alternative chains. Similarly, DeBank warned that a hard fork could bring “catastrophic consequences” to the Web3 ecosystem and pledged allegiance only to the PoS chain.
Frax Finance: Governance-Driven Alignment
Frax Finance co-founder Sam Kazemian proposed a governance vote urging Frax DAO to recognize only PoS Ethereum as valid post-Merge. Given Frax’s significance—ranking among top tokens on Uniswap and holding substantial TVL on Curve—this move adds weight to the legitimacy of the upgraded chain.
Why Stablecoins Could Decide Everything
As Vitalik Buterin noted, centralized stablecoins like USDC and USDT may become decisive actors in determining which chain survives.
👉 See how stablecoin dynamics could reshape blockchain networks during major upgrades.
If these issuers choose to back only the PoS chain (as expected), liquidity on the PoW fork would collapse. Conversely, if they were to support—or worse, manipulate—the PoW chain, chaos could ensue.
Imagine this scenario: a stablecoin issuer supports redemption on the PoW chain while shorting ETH on the PoS side. Suddenly, billions in liabilities emerge across two chains. Such an event could trigger mass liquidations, destabilize lending protocols, and erode trust across DeFi.
While legally risky, the financial incentive is enormous—making regulatory oversight critical during this transition.
Expert Opinions: Is PoW Doomed?
Jack Niewold of Crypto Pragmatist calls the PoW hard fork an “Ethereum civil war.” He argues that without developer activity, media attention, or real-world exit ramps (i.e., exchanges allowing fiat withdrawals), a PoW chain would become a digital ghost town.
He highlights technical hurdles like the "difficulty bomb" and stresses that social consensus already favors PoS Ethereum as the true chain. Even if mined for speculative gain, long-term utility seems unlikely.
Market Signals: stETH Discount Reflects Uncertainty
Market indicators are already reacting. stETH (Lido’s staked ETH derivative) trades at a 3.7% discount to ETH—a sign of investor caution ahead of the Merge. This reflects concerns over liquidity, timing delays, and potential fork-related volatility.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is the Ethereum hard fork related to the Merge?
A: The Merge refers to Ethereum’s shift from PoW to PoS. A hard fork could create two chains—one continuing PoW (e.g., ETHW), and one running PoS (the official Ethereum chain).
Q: Will I get free coins if Ethereum forks?
A: If a fork occurs and your exchange supports it, you may receive 1:1 forked tokens. However, only exchanges like Gate.io and Poloniex have confirmed such plans so far.
Q: Which Ethereum chain is considered "real" after the Merge?
A: The PoS chain is widely recognized as the legitimate Ethereum network by core developers, major projects, and most of the ecosystem.
Q: Could a PoW fork succeed long-term?
A: Unlikely. Without support from key infrastructure (oracles, wallets, stablecoins), developer momentum, or exchange listings, it would struggle to maintain value or utility.
Q: How do exchanges decide whether to list a forked token?
A: Criteria include replay protection, network independence, client readiness, and community consensus—Huobi’s five-point framework exemplifies best practices.
Q: Should I worry about my staked ETH before the Merge?
A: Staking protocols like Lido will eventually enable withdrawals post-upgrade. Current stETH discounts reflect temporary market uncertainty, not permanent risk.
Final Outlook
The Ethereum hard fork debate underscores deeper tensions within decentralized ecosystems: innovation vs. tradition, decentralization vs. coordination, speculation vs. utility.
While some miners and traders may push for a PoW continuation, overwhelming institutional, technical, and social momentum favors the PoS chain. For now, preparation—not panic—is key.
As stakeholders align and markets react, one truth becomes clearer: Ethereum’s future is staking-powered, sustainable, and unified—by design.
Core Keywords: Ethereum hard fork, proof-of-stake Ethereum, ETH Merge update, stETH price analysis, PoW vs PoS debate, Ethereum network split